BUSITEMA UNIVERSITY | LIBRARY
Log in
 
Repository logo
Repository logo
  • Submit an Item
  • Browse
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Ayuen, S. Dhol"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Comparing HemoCue® and Quantitative Buffy Coat® and Coulter Counter‑measured haemoglobin concentrations in African children with acute uncomplicated malaria: a Bland–Altman analysis
    (BMC, 2025) Ayuen, S. Dhol; Olupot‑Olupot, Peter; Muhindo, Rita; Onyamboko, A. Marie; Ajayi, Seun; Chimjinda, Natenapa; Taya, Chiraporn; Uyoga, Sophie; Williams, N. Thomas; Maitland, Kathryn; Fanello, Caterina; Day, P. J. Nicholas; Taylor, R. Walter; Mukaka, Mavuto
    Background: Anaemia is a deleterious consequence of malaria, and its accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective management. However, laboratory methods for measuring haemoglobin (Hb) concentration, like the Coulter Counter and the Quantitative Buffy Coat® (QBC®), are costly and not widely accessible in resource-limited settings. The pointof-care HemoCue® test is a cheaper alternative and suitable in rural areas. The study aimed to determine the level of agreement between Coulter Counter/QBC® vs. HemoCue®-measured Hb concentrations by Bland–Altman analysis. Methods: As part of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of single low-dose primaquine in Ugandan and Congolese children with acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria, Hb concentrations were measured on days 0, 3, 7, and 28 using Coulter Counter (Uganda, n=1880 paired values), QBC® (DR Congo, n=1984 paired values) and HemoCue® Hb-301™. The predefined clinically acceptable limits were set at±0.5 g/dL. Results: The Bland–Altman analysis showed that the HemoCue® minus Coulter Counter mean Hb difference was − 0.15 g/dL with lower and upper limits of agreement of − 3.68 g/dL and 3.39 g/dL, respectively. Corresponding HemoCue® minus QBC® values were − 0.23 g/dL, − 1.66 g/dL and 1.22 g/dL. Linear regression of Hb concentration differences vs. mean Hb concentrations showed negative correlations: r=− 0.43 and r=− 0.34 for HemoCue® vs. Coulter Counter and HemoCue® vs. QBC®, respectively. Conclusions: Compared to Coulter and QBC®, mean HemoCue® measured Hb concentrations were lower and, compared to the Coulter or QBC® methods, had an overall tendency to measure lower Hb concentrations with increasing Hb concentrations. Upper and lower limits of agreement were wider than the predefined clinically acceptable limits of±0.5 g/dL. HemoCue® should be used with caution in settings where decisions about blood transfusions are made. Keywords Bland–Altman analysis, Haemoglobin, Anaemia, Malaria, HemoCue, Coulter Counter, QBC®
Contact us for questions and to provide feedback.

Repository logo

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback