Browsing by Author "Kalungia, Aubrey Chichonyi"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Fixed dose drug combinations – are they pharmacoeconomically sound?:
    (Informa UK Limited, 2020) Godmana, Brian; McCabee, Holly; Leong, Trudy D.; Mueller, Debjani; Martini, Antony P.; Hoxhak, Iris; Mwital, Julius C.; Mutashambara Rwegereram, Godfrey; Masselen, Amos; Costao, Juliana de Oliveira; Rezende Macedo do Nascimentoa, Renata Cristina; Pires de Lemoso, Livia Lovato; Tachkovs, Konstantin; Milushewas, Petya; Patrickt, Okwen; Lum Nibat, Loveline; Laiusw, Ott; Sefah, Israel; Abdulsalimy, Suhaj; Soleymaniz, Fatemeh; Guantai, Anastasia N; Achieng, Loice; Oluka, Margaret; Jakupi, Arianit; Logviss, Konstantīns; Hassali, Mohamed Azmi; Kibuule, Dan; Kalemeera, Francis; Mubita, Mwangana; Fadaregg, Joseph; Ogunleye, Olayinka O.; Saleem, Zikria; Hussain, Shazhad; Bochenek, Tomasz; Mardare, Ileana; Alrasheedy, Alian A.; Furst, Jurij; Tomek, Dominik; Markovic-Pekovic, Vanda; Rampamba, Enos M.; Alfadl, Abubakr; Amu, Adefolarin A.; Matsebula, Zinhle; Thi Phuong, Thuy Nguyen; Thanh, Binh Nguyen; Kalungia, Aubrey Chichonyi; Zaranyika, Trust; Masuka, Nyasha; Olarua, Ioana D.; Wale, Janney; Hill, Ruaraidh; Kurdia, Amanj; Timoneya, Angela; Campbell, Stephen; Meyer, Johanna C.
    Introduction: There are positive aspects regarding the prescribing of fixed dose combinations (FDCs) versus prescribing the medicines separately. However, these have to be balanced against concerns including increased costs and their irrationality in some cases. Consequently, there is a need to review their value among lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs) which have the greatest prevalence of both infectious and noninfectious diseases and issues of affordability. Areas covered: Review of potential advantages, disadvantages, cost-effectiveness, and availability of FDCs in high priority disease areas in LMICs and possible initiatives to enhance the prescribing of valued FDCs and limit their use where there are concerns with their value. Expert commentary: FDCs are valued across LMICs. Advantages include potentially improved response rates, reduced adverse reactions, increased adherence rates, and reduced costs. Concerns include increased chances of drug:drug interactions, reduced effectiveness, potential for imprecise diagnoses and higher unjustified prices. Overall certain FDCs including those for malaria, tuberculosis, and hypertension are valued and listed in the country’s essential medicine lists, with initiatives needed to enhance their prescribing where currently low prescribing rates. Proposed initiatives include robust clinical and economic data to address the current paucity of pharmacoeconomic data. Irrational FDCs persists in some countries which are being addressed. KEYWORDS: Fixed dose combinations; pharmacoeconomics; adherence; medicines; noncommunicable diseases; infectious diseases; lower and middle income countries
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Pharmacotherapeutic interventions for bipolar disorder type II:
    (Taylor & Francis, 2019) Godman, Brian; Grobler, Christoffel; Van-De-Lisleh, Marianne; Walei, Janney; Barbosa, Wallace Breno; Masselek, Amos; Opondo, Philip; Petrova, Guenka; Tachkov, Konstantin; Sefah, Israel; Abdulsalimo, Suhaj; Alrasheedy, Alian A.; Unnikrishnanp, Mazhuvancherry Kesavan; Garuoliene, Kristina; Bamitaler, Kayode; Kibuule, Dan; Kalemeera, Francis; Fadare, Joseph; Khan, Tanveer Ahmed; Hussain, Shahzad; Bochenek, Tomasz; Kalungia, Aubrey Chichonyi; Mwanza, James; Martin, Antony P; Hill, Ruaraidh; Barbui, Corrado
    Introduction: Appropriately managing mental disorders is a growing priority across countries in view of the impact on morbidity and mortality. This includes patients with bipolar disorders (BD). Management of BD is a concern as this is a complex disease with often misdiagnosis, which is a major issue in lower and middleincome countries (LMICs) with typically a limited number of trained personnel and resources. This needs to be addressed. Areas covered: Medicines are the cornerstone of managing patients with Bipolar II across countries including LMICs. The choice of medicines, especially antipsychotics, is important in LMICs with high rates of diabetes and HIV. However, care is currently compromised in LMICs by issues such as the stigma, cultural beliefs, a limited number of trained professionals and high patient co-payments. Expert opinion: Encouragingly, some LMICs have introduced guidelines for patients with BD; however, this is very variable. Strategies for the future include addressing the lack of national guidelines for patients with BD, improving resources for mental disorders including personnel, improving medicine availability and patients’ rights, and monitoring prescribing against agreed guidelines. A number of strategies have been identified to improve the treatment of patients with Bipolar II in LMICs, and will be followed up. KEYWORDS: Bipolar disorders; bipolar disorder type II; lower and middle-income countries; health policies; treatment; pharmaceuticals; differential diagnosis