The problem with sovereignty bill.
| dc.contributor.author | Nekyon, Arafat Engena | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-24T11:52:54Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-08-24T11:52:54Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-04-27 | |
| dc.description | Newspaper article | |
| dc.description.abstract | Sovereignty of a nation has essentially two perspectives, external and internal. In substance, the adoption of the structural adjustment programmes (SAPs) in May 1987 was a surrender of our external sovereignty by the NRM government to the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). International borrowing, regulation and promotion of foreign direct investment (FDI), international grants and developmental assistance through local financial and credit institutions were tools employed to destroy the external aspect of our sovereignty. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Nekyon, A. E. (2026). The problem with sovereignty bill. Daily Monitor. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://bdears.busitema.ac.ug/handle/123456789/9077 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Daily Monitor | |
| dc.title | The problem with sovereignty bill. | |
| dc.type | Article |