OPTIMIZING THE PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF BAMBOO FIBER REINFORCED UNFIRED CLAY BRICKS.
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2026
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
busitema unversity
Abstract
Uganda faces a critical housing deficit exceeding 2.4 million units, compounded by the environmental and economic unsustainability of conventional fired clay brick (FCB) production. Unfired clay bricks offer a low-carbon alternative, but their inherent low tensile strength and high moisture sensitivity limit adoption in tropical climates. This study systematically optimized bamboo fiber reinforced unfired clay bricks (BFR-UCBs) using Response Surface Methodology with a Central Composite Design (RSM-CCD) across three independent variables: cement content (C: 4.0–10.0%), bamboo fiber content (BF: 0.50–2.00%), and fiber length (FL: 10–20 mm), at three curing ages (7, 14, and 28 days). Clay soil was sourced from Busitema Sub-county (57.4% fines, MDD = 1,878 kg/m³, OMC = 14.2%). Bambusa vulgaris fibers were treated with 2% NaOH to improve matrix bonding and reduce moisture absorption from 18.1% to 12.4%. The RSM-CCD numerical optimization identified the global optimum at C = 8%, BF = 1.75%, FL = 20 mm (composite desirability d = 0.94), yielding a 28-day compressive strength of 5.12 MPa, water absorption of 8.4%, and dry density of 1,875 kg/m³. Comparative testing showed BFR-UCBs outperform artisanal FCBs by 66.75% in compressive strength (6.42 MPa vs. 3.75 MPa) and 48.78% in water absorption resistance, with a coefficient of variation of 2.13% versus 13.36% for FCBs. A significant fiber length × cement interaction confirmed that longer fibers can partially substitute cement without compromising structural performance. BFR-UCBs exceed the EAS 105:2005 minimum of 3.5 MPa and meet ASTM C67 durability criteria, positioning them as a technically viable, environmentally superior substitute for FCBs in Uganda’s construction sector.
Keywords: bamboo fiber reinforcement; unfired clay bricks; RSM-CCD optimization; cement stabilization; Uganda; sustainable construction; EAS 105:2005
Description
The sponsors have been very supportive.
Keywords
Citation
humphrey M et al., 2026